Charlemagne

Personal Profile

Born: 2 April 742, 747 or 748, Frankish Kingdom (modern-day France)

Died: 28 January 814 (aged 65, 66 or 71), Aachen, Francia (modern-day Germany)

Reign: King of the Franks (9 October 768 – 28 January 814); King of the Lombards (10 July 774 – 28 January 814); Holy Roman Emperor (25 December 800 – 28 January 814)

Marriages: Desiderata (m. c.770, ann. 771); Hildegard of Vinzgouw (m. 771. d. 783); Fastrada (m. c.783, d. 794); Luitgard (m. c.794; d. 800)

Children: Pepin the Hunchback, Charles the Younger, Pepin of Italy, Louis the Pious; amongst others (roughly 18 in total)

Dynasty: Carolingian

Early Life (c.742 – c.770)

A depiction of Charlemagne on a
denarius coin, dated c.812

Charlemagne, also known as Charles the Great or Charles I, was King of the Franks from 768, King of the Lombards from 774, and the Holy Roman Emperor from 800. But how did he get there in the first place?

First of all, there is debate about when Charlemagne was even born. It is often assumed that he was born in either 742, 747, or 748 – somewhere in the Frankish Kingdom (likely Aachen, in modern-day Germany). His father was the first Carolingian king of the Franks, Pepin the Short (r. 751-68). The debate largely lies around the fact that if he was born in 742, he would have been born out of wedlock – something which was completely unacceptable for a king in medieval Europe. Either way, Charlemagne was born at some point during the 740s in the Frankish Kingdom!

Unfortunately, there is not much evidence from his early years. He was the eldest child of Pepin the Short and Bertrada of Laon, and had a younger brother, called Carloman, who co-ruled with Charlemagne (as Carloman I) from 768-71.

Fast-forwarding to that tumultuous period in the late 760s, Pepin the Short had decided, before his death, to split his kingdom between his two sons, Charlemagne and Carloman. This was never going to work when two sons were both fighting for the crown, and neither wanted to rule jointly with the other. After roughly three years of quarrelling with one another, Carloman was dead. A contemporary report suggested that he died of a bad nosebleed. Ignoring the suspicious circumstances surrounding his brother’s death, Charlemagne wasted no time in seizing what he viewed as his rightful lands: in 771, he took away lands from Carloman’s two young sons (who were not old enough to challenge him for it), and combined it with his own inheritance, which was mostly in modern-day Belgium and Germany. Charlemagne was ready to take on Europe.

Early Conquests (c.770 – c.780)

Europe in 771, three years after
Charlemagne was crowned King of
the Franks

Arguably the most adventurous years of Charlemagne’s life had just begun. He started by uniting together the two halves of his father’s realm, gifted to himself and Carloman (Neustria and Austrasia in medieval European geographical terms). Ultimately, this stretched his Frankish kingdom from the Danube River to the Atlantic Ocean in an East-West direction, and from the Netherlands to Provence in a North-South direction.

His next major campaign took him south towards Italy, where he conquered Lombardy, south of the Alps. From winter 773 to summer 774 he managed to consolidate a hold over this kingdom and was crowned King of the Lombards on 10 July 774. Upon seeing how easy he made this mission, contemporary chroniclers reported that other Germanic tribes beyond the Elbe River in Central Europe paid homage to Charlemagne, although many still remained pagan.

The following year, in 775, Charlemagne begun the long conquest of Saxony, arguably his hardest. He eventually succeeded in converting the Saxons to Catholicism, but it took him until 804 to fully subdue them.

The ‘Father of Europe’ and Courtly Life (c.770 – c.800)

Charlemagne's Empire. The yellow
sections are further expansions to the
Empire he inherited.

Amongst all of the fighting (which he almost constantly did throughout his reign), Charlemagne’s court was sophisticated. For instance, it was in this court that the ancient term of ‘Europe’ was revived: the Carolingians needed a term to describe the section of the known world which they dominated, and more importantly they needed a term which distinguished themselves from the pagan lands of Central and Eastern Europe, from Byzantium, or from Christendom as a whole. Historian Norman Davies argues that “This ‘First Europe’, therefore, was an ephemeral Western concept which lasted no longer than Charlemagne himself.” Even so, this plays a large part in why Charlemagne is often referred to as the ‘Father of Europe’.

In addition to this, Charlemagne was an enthusiastic builder. He built palaces across his realm, including at Nijmegen, Engelheim and Aachen. He also built bridges over the Rhine at Mainz, and linked together the tributaries of the Rhine and Danube with a canal known as the Kaisergarb. Additionally, he was a pioneer of Romanesque architecture north of the Alps, bringing architectural influences from Lombardy across the mountain range into North-Western Europe; he sought to make his capital of Aachen a ‘northern Rome’, according to historian Simon Jenkins: he based his palatine chapel on St Vitale in Ravenna, and begged the Pope for mosaics from Ravenna to adorn it.

The Frankish Empire from 481 - 814
(Charlemagne's death). Note how much
it expanded during Charlemagne's reign
from 768-814.

He was also a patron of education and learning, yet despite this, he himself was illiterate. One of his most famous scholars was an English monk, Alcuin of York (735-804). Alcuin became head of Aachen’s palace school, as well as Charlemagne’s spiritual adviser, and presided over what came to be known in history as the Carolingian Renaissance.

Charlemagne (as we shall see later) governed the Church as an integral part of his domains. Some historians call him hypocritical for some of his actions, because while he forbade his bishops to engage in battle personally, the way he spread the Gospel through kingdoms he conquered was through ‘fire and sword’.

Holy Roman Emperor and Later Years (c. 788 – 814)

After conquering Bavaria in 788, the West of Charlemagne’s empire was relatively secure, and it gave him chance to turn his attention to problems elsewhere, notably in the east.

Over in Byzantium, the Emperor Leo IV had died, leaving his consort Empress Irene in charge. And this was the main problem – Irene was sitting in as consort until her son Constantine VI was of age (he was still a minor), and the main problem in the West was that a woman was in charge of the Byzantine Empire – something unfathomable to most medieval kings!

She also called the Second Council of Nicaea in 787, which condemned iconoclasm (the use of imagery and icons in the Catholic Church) as heretical. Charlemagne was irritated that he himself had not been called to the Council, and demanded an explanation from Pope Adrian I. Before Adrian could respond, Charlemagne ordered his theologians to produce a defence of iconoclasm, which came to be known as Libri Carolini. Due to this, his relationship with Adrian I was strained, but the cloud eventually passed, and both were on civil terms by the time of Adrian’s death in December 795.

Yet this is where the main even begins. Adrian’s successor, Pope Leo III (not to be confused with the Byzantine Emperor of the same name), was not of noble birth, and some even spread rumours that he was an Arab. As a result, Adrian’s family and friends tried to have him eradicated: on 25 April 799, a group led by the late Pope’s nephew attacked Leo while he was on a solemn procession in Rome. They failed in their mission of blinding him and cutting off his tongue – something which would have forced him to resign as Pope – but left him unconscious instead. Luckily, he was rescued by passers-by and friends, and removed to safety at Charlemagne’s court in Paderborn.

The two became good friends, and on Leo’s return to Rome in November 799, he found himself facing charges of adultery, simony and perjury. Charlemagne was suspicious of these wild accusations, and moreover questioned how could a Pope be tried? How could God’s voice on Earth be tried, and by whom? Normally, the answer would have been the Emperor in Constantinople – but Irene was on the throne. A woman passing judgement on a man in medieval Europe was incomprehensible. So as far as western Europe was concerned, the Throne of Emperors in Byzantium was vacant. That Irene, a woman, even sat on it in the first place showed how far the Roman Empire had fallen in the eyes of the Pope and Charlemagne. 

By the time Charlemagne reached Rome in November 800, he had been firmly reminded by Alcuin that he had no more authority to pass judgement on the Pope than Irene did, but he also knew that while the accusations remained unsettled, Christendom lacked both an Emperor and a Pope. On 23 December, Leo solemnly swore on the Gospel that the accusations were untrue: remarkably, the assembly accepted the claim and his name was cleared. Two days later, on Christmas Day 800, Pope Leo III laid the imperial crown on Charlemagne’s head, and crowned him Holy Roman Emperor.

Pope Leo III crowning
Charlemagne as Holy
Roman Emperor (this is
a portrait from c.1325-50)

But why did Leo give Charlemagne this title of Holy Roman Emperor? It seemed at the time that Charlemagne would prove a more useful ally than distant Constantinople – should accusations come against the Papacy again, then it would be easier for the accusing party and the Papacy to sort it out in Central Europe, rather than waiting for a response from an Emperor on the fringes of Asia. Historian John Julius Norwich argues that Leo III created Charlemagne as Holy Roman Emperor because “the Byzantines had proved so unsatisfactory from every point of view – political, military and doctrinal – he would select a Westerner: the one man who, by his wisdom, his statesmanship and the vastness of his dominions…stood head and shoulders above his contemporaries.” 

Yet for all the pomp and ceremony, and the imperial title being given to him, various chroniclers and historians alike have since argued that it was a complete surprise to Charlemagne that he was awarded this title: Charlemagne’s biographer, the Abbot Einhard, claimed that the coronation occurred spontaneously: despite this argument, regardless if it was spontaneous or carefully rehearsed, the coronation happened and left a Catholic Emperor in the West – independent of Byzantium – and the once barbaric Frankish kingdom which Charlemagne had inherited from his father in 768 was now upgraded, dependent on the Pope for its new status.

Moreover, Einhard also wrote that Charlemagne claimed that he never would have set foot in the basilica had he known that Leo would place the imperial crown upon his head, and to an extent this argument rings true: for the rest of his life, Charlemagne continued to style himself as Rex Francorum et Langobardorum (King of the Franks and the Lombards), rather than as Holy Roman Emperor.

The remaining years after Charlemagne’s coronation saw more conquests, further imperial expansion and surprisingly little involvement in religious matters, despite his title. Charlemagne died peacefully on 28 January 814, in Aachen, where he was buried. His eldest surviving son, Louis the Pious, succeeded him.

Legacy

Few people have gone down in history as well as Charlemagne. To this day, he still inspires people from all walks of life (the indie band Blossoms released a song called Charlemagne in 2015, suggesting his legacy is still going strong today).

Despite the claim that he was uninterested in the imperial title, he nevertheless took his role seriously: the renewed Empire was intended to be both Roman and Christian. Historian David Starkey writes that “[Charlemagne] was soldier of the Faith and reformer of the Church, on the one hand, and, on the other, restorer of the Roman Empire, whose inheritance of law, language, literature, architecture and forms of government he was determined to revive.”

Moreover, despite the fact that the Eastern Roman Empire was reduced to Asia Minor and its Mediterranean outposts, Charlemagne, as the secular head of western Christendom, was the first figure since the Roman Emperors to span at least the heart of Europe. His legacy as Holy Roman Emperor (and Pope Leo III can also be thanked for this) stood the test of time: the Holy Roman Empire was a prominent feature of Europe’s political geography until it was dismantled by another Frenchman, Napoleon, in 1806. So for over 1000 years, this title stood strong, and survived numerous European dynasties.

Charlemagne was also canonised – although this process was not fully complete until 1165, as his sexual conquests were deemed no less extensive than his imperialistic ones: this might be something to do with the fact that he had eighteen (legitimate!) children with ten wives…not sure though!

To sum up his legacy in simple terms, I will turn to his epitaph on his tomb at Aachen (which is sadly lost now): it read:

“Beneath this tomb lies the body of Charles, great and orthodox Emperor, who nobly increased the kingdom of the Franks, and reigned prosperously for forty-seven years.”

And thus ends the story of the Father of Europe himself, Charlemagne. Thanks for reading!

Bibliography

Norman Davies, Europe: A History (2014)

Simon Jenkins, A Short History of Europe: From Pericles to Putin (2018)

John Julius Norwich, The Popes: A History (2011)

David Starkey, Crown & Country: The Kings and Queens of England – A History (2010)

Genghis Khan

Genghis Khan

Personal Profile

A fourteenth-century Yuan-era
portrait of Genghis Khan

Born: Temüjin Borjigin (birth name), c. 1162, Khentii Mountains, Khamag Mongol, Mongolia

Died: 18^th August 1227 (aged 64-65), Yinchuan, Western Xia Province, China

Titles: First Khagan and Emperor of the Mongol Empire | Supreme Khan of all the Mongols | King of Kings (Jin Emperor)

Reign: Spring 1206 – 18^th August 1227

Marriages: approximately 11

Children: 22 acknowledged children, estimates of up to 2000 illegitimate children in total

Early Life c. 1162 – 1180

The Khentii Mountains lie just north of
Ulanbaatar, the capital of Mongolia

Temüjin Borjigin (who later adopted the title Genghis Khan, but for the sake of simplicity I will refer to him as Genghis or Genghis Khan throughout this blog post) was born into a small clan in the Khentii Mountains in North Eastern Mongolia around about 1162. Although we know little of his early life, there is still sufficient evidence to piece together his early years.

Genghis’ father was poisoned when he was only eight years old, and his father was head of the clan. Lacking any sort of effective chieftain, the rest of the senior members of the clan banished Genghis’ mother, his brothers, his half-brothers and Genghis himself. One early record written two or three decades after Genghis’ death reported that as a child and adolescent, Genghis and his immediate family had to forage for food, living primarily on carrion, mice and plants to survive. In other words, this great leader to be had been at the very bottom of a societal pecking order and still managed to rise to the top.

It took Genghis until he was in his forties before he managed to achieve the title of Genghis Khan (literally translating as “Great Ruler”). But how did he do this?

Empire Building: c.1180 – 1206

A section of the Great Wall of China,
originally built for keeping out
"barbarians" - initially the Huns in
the fourth century AD, then the Mongols
in the High Middle Ages

Although the largely romanticised account suggested that Genghis had been at the very bottom of society (which he had in truth), it did not mean that his family had also come from the bottom. Genghis’ grandfather, Khabul Khan, had defeated the Jin Dynasty in China on numerous occasions, and was a successful Mongol warrior.

In around 1180, a sudden decrease in temperature on the steppe had brought about a climatic crisis: it was too cold for the grass to grow, and thus there was insufficient grass for the tribes’ animals to graze. This situation was eventually rectified by none other than Genghis himself: he unified the warring tribes and led them south to the agriculturally rich Chinese lands.

Historian Bamber Gascoigne argues that Genghis united the various Mongol tribes and clans through a combination of trust and terror. While building up his following, Genghis rewarded courage and loyalty – anyone who had fought well against him, but had been defeated, was offered a promotion in Genghis’ army. Only cowardice and treachery were punished. However, in later years when he was expanding into alien lands, the conditions were reversed: towns which had put up a brave resistance were rounded up and brutally massacred in public. One source reported that Mongol troops were given battle-axes and told to set to work with them on the citizens of the towns which were unfortunate enough to be in Genghis’ path. On one occasion, a tally of ears was required as proof that the Mongol soldiers had dispatched their allotted quota. Fear ultimately played its part in the expansion of Genghis’ empire: spies infiltrated city walls and spread the word that the immediate surrender might be rewarded with mercy. Citizens rarely needed persuading to surrender quickly.

Yet aside from the psychological aspect of empire building, Genghis also physically strengthened his empire, and this was via one famous medium: horsemen. The Mongolian horsemen were notorious wherever they went. They were specially trained from a young age, and able to stand up in the stirrups while their horses were charging in battle, and able to fire their heavy bows with incredible accuracy to devastating effect. The horsemen were also able to communicate news at a rapid speed across the empire by galloping in relay, day and night, across the steppes and deserts of Central Asia.

Major Conquests and Later Years, c. 1206 – 1227

The first image many of us conjure when we hear the term “Mongols” is one of bloodthirsty, unreliable, chaotic tribal warriors. In fact, under Genghis Khan, the rise of the Mongols was the complete opposite: the result of ruthless planning, streamlined organisation and a clear set of strategic objectives. One of the most devastating of which was his decision to defeat the Western Xia in China in 1209.

In the immediate years preceding this invasion, Genghis had defeated his rival tribes north of the wall (from approximately 1206-09), and after some careful planning, set out to northern China in 1212.

The Mongol armies swept across northern China between 1212 and 1213, laying waste to over ninety cities, and by 1215 they had taken the Jin capital of Yanjing (modern-day Beijing), forcing the Jin Emperor Xuanzong to flee south to Kaifeng. This left the Mongols to occupy the northern half of his kingdom, and for Genghis Khan to proclaim himself Jin Emperor, or Emperor of the Yuan Dynasty. All that remained of the Laio Dynasty was an area referred to as the Western Liao, and Genghis conquered this the following year.

In 1218-19, Genghis sent out a five-hundred man strong caravan to the Silk Road (the major trade route connecting Europe to China) after he saw the benefits of opening up trade links with the Kwarezmian Empire (which covers territory in modern-day Iran). However, his caravan was attacked by the governor of the Kwarezmian city of Otrar (now a ghost-town and archaeological site in modern-day southern Kazakhstan), which infuriated Genghis. To add insult to injury, any envoys he sent were beheaded, forcing Genghis into action. In 1219-20, a huge Mongol force set out from the Empire, and defeated the Shah’s army. Genghis followed up by taking Samarkand and Bukhara (both cities in modern-day Uzbekistan), tearing everything from royal palaces to towns and innocent civilians to the ground. By late 1220, the Kwarezmian Empire had been completely destroyed by Genghis’ forces.

Areas of the Chinese dynasties Genghis
Khan conquered

After the destruction of the Kwarezmian Empire in 1220, the Mongols split into two forces: Genghis returned to Mongolia with half of his army, raiding through Afghanistan and India on the way back, while two of his most trusted generals, Jebe and Subutai rode through the Caucasus and into Russia. They spent the winter by the Black Sea before returning back to Mongolia. Thanks to their conquests north, and Genghis’ east, the area known as Transoxiana – the part of Central Asia that covers modern-day Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, southern Kyrgyzstan and southwest Kazakhstan – and Persia – was now part of the Mongol Empire.

The Mongol Empire in 1227, the year
of Genghis' death

During the mid-1220s (estimates rally from Summer 1224 to Spring 1225), the Tanguts of the Western Xia and the defeated Jin Dynasty joined forces in an attempt to subdue what they believed to be an exhausted Mongol army. In 1226, Genghis Khan attacked and quickly took Heisi, Ganzhou, Suzhou and Xiliangfu by the autumn. In early 1227, he destroyed the Tangut capital of Ning Hia, and continued onwards with his advance. By summer 1227, he had already taken the imperial family as prisoners and had them executed.

The most widely reported incidence of Genghis’ death comes from this area. It was reported that he was castrated by a Tangut princess in revenge for his treatment of her people, and to prevent him from raping her. He is said to have died as a result of his wounds. And thus came the end of Genghis Khan!

Legacy

The Mongol Empire in 1279, under
the leadership of one of Genghis'
formidable grandsons, Kublai Khan

Genghis’ legacy did not end rolling on the marbled floor of a Tangut castle. As was customary at the time, his empire was divided up between his four sons, creating four great Mongol kingdoms, known as khanates: The Yuan Dynasty in the East, containing China and Mongolia; the Chagatai in Central Asia around Transoxiana; the Golden Horde to the northwest, stretching from Siberia to Eastern Europe; and the Ilkhanate, trickling down to Persia.

Genghis Khan and his descendants had created the largest land empire in history, stretching from the East China Sea to Poland at its peak in the mid-thirteenth century, uniting millions of people under one rule. This rule was tolerant in some respects, but largely founded on the principles of total and complete warfare.

Readers may remember my last blog post about the Black Death, and how I mentioned that the Mongols were referred to as “Tartars”. This name was a reference to Tartarus from Ancient Greek mythology: the abyss of torment. This was how many Europeans saw these huge hordes of Mongol warriors – and largely how they are remembered today. Reports of their advance reached as far as Scotland in the thirteenth century, and according to one source, herring went unsold in ports on the eastern coast of Britain, because the merchants who usually came to buy it from the Black Sea dared not to leave home for fear of the Mongols ransacking their towns and villages.

By 1241, the Mongols had reached Europe, and split into two hordes: one heading for Poland and the other for Hungary. Their philosophy was simple: they had a worldview which stopped at nothing short of global domination, and conquering Europe was their next logical step in imperial expansion. For a medieval empire to reach this far was not only an incredible achievement, but synonymous with the supreme ability and legacy of the Great Ruler himself: Genghis Khan.

Bibliography

Peter Frankopan, The Silk Roads: A New History of the World (2015)

Bamber Gascoigne, A Brief History of the Dynasties of China: 3500 Years of Chinese Civilisation (2003)

Dan Jones, The Templars: The Rise and Spectacular Fall of God’s Holy Warriors (2017)

Gordon Kerr, A Short History of China: From Ancient Dynasties to Economic Powerhouse (2013)

The Black Death

A map of the transmission of the Black Death from Asia to Europe.
Note that Poland and Central Europe remained relatively unaffected - this
was because there were very few trade routes, and people fleeing towns and
cities rarely got that far into Central Europe.

We’ve all heard of it, but what was it? When did it happen? Where did it come from? Who did it affect? What did contemporaries at the time think of it? Read on to find out!

The Black Death or plague?

The Black Death is the name given to the strain of bubonic plague (or pneumonic plague, or even anthrax as some controversial historians have argued) which ravaged Europe from 1346-53. The peak years of the Black Death are generally seen as 1348-52, and it is, to this day, the most devastating natural disaster in recorded human history: estimates of between a third and a half of Europe's population died from the Black Death.

The Plague of Justinian, 541-42 AD

However, the Black Death was not the first instance of a major plague pandemic in European history. In 541, the Plague of Justinian (named after the Roman Emperor at the time) hit the Byzantine Empire and the Eastern European Empire, causing mass deaths – contemporary sources largely over-exaggerated figures and estimated between 25 and 100 million people were killed. So, if this was the case, why is the Black Death still so significant?

The Plague of Justinian lasted for a mere year, until 542. However, waves of bubonic plague in the aftermath of the Black Death continued to hit Europe throughout the fourteenth century, and even bouts of it returned in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. The cultural, social and economic impacts of the Black Death were enormous, as we shall soon see!

What was it?

The simple answer is bubonic plague. But what is bubonic plague? The most recognisable symptom were buboes – huge, black boils which affected the lymph nodes: primarily the neck, groin and armpits. Other symptoms included those similar to a fever. During the Black Death, when a person contracted it, they could expect to live for anywhere between two days to a week, usually in excruciating pain from the buboes which could burst.

Where did it come from?

The Black Death is often attributed to the ‘Tartars’ – more commonly known as the Mongols. Although it likely originated in China, the Mongols spread it rapidly to India and then into Europe. The Black Death was originally thought to have been carried by black rats, rattus rattus. However, it was actually fleas on the rats who transmitted it.

Europe and the Black Death

The Mongol Siege of Caffa, 1346. One of the most widely
remembered incidences of biological warfare.

The first recorded case of the Black Death in Europe was when it reached the Genoese colony of Caffa, in the Crimea, which was under siege by the Mongols in 1346. In one of the most notorious cases of biological warfare, the Mongols catapulted plague-ridden corpses over the city walls of Caffa in order to break its resistance: it worked, and the Genoese defenders of the city rowed away for safety – in a huge mistake which inadvertently spread the plague to the rest of Europe in huge swathes over the next decade.

The plague had reached a key Mediterranean port by October 1347: Messina in Sicily. This was one of the worst affected places in Europe during the Black Death, because it was a key trading route. With more ships continuing to come in, more people were spreading it to other areas in Europe and North Africa.

By January 1348, the plague had reached Genoa: a major trading hub and colony in Europe. It had reached Genoa by a galley which had come from Caffa. The Genoese governors – in a move which is somewhat reflective of governments in today’s current Coronavirus pandemic – banned the galley from stopping at Genoa. In doing so, they saved Genoese citizens (very temporarily), but had not instructed the galley where to go: it sailed on to Marseilles and Venice, which ultimately spread the plague further through the Mediterranean and mainland Europe.

1348 was arguably the most important year in terms of the Black Death and it’s reach: it spread through to Pisa and Florence (another major trading hub in Italy) and Paris. In 1348, it also crossed the English Channel and reached England through the Bristol Channel. From 1349 it spread eastwards through Germany, and south-east into the Balkans, and by 1350 it had spread as far north as Scotland, Denmark and Sweden.

Contemporaries and their thoughts

Although there were plenty of contemporary chroniclers writing about the Black Death (for an almost complete collection, I highly recommend having a look at The Black Death by Rosemary Horrox), I have singled out just a few significant ones.

Giovanni Boccaccio

Giovanni Boccaccio
(1313-75)

Born in Florence in 1313, Boccaccio was in his mid-thirties when the Black Death struck his home city. He estimated that 100,000 people had died in Florence as a result of the Black Death – but those figures have since been disproved, as the total population of Florence at the time was not even 100,000. Recent estimates suggest that perhaps as many as 50,000 died – a staggeringly huge amount, regardless.

Boccaccio’s most famous work was the Decameron. Written as part fiction, and part non-fiction, it tells a story of a group of wealthy Florentines who escaped the city and stayed in a country house (self-isolating!) telling tales of the Black Death to pass the time. Boccaccio died in 1375, thus surviving the Black Death.

Gabriel de Mussis

A lawyer from Piacenza, Northern Italy, de Mussis took it upon himself to write a chronicle about the Black Death, even though chronicles were largely reserved for monks and clergymen. The fact that he took it upon himself to write it shows that he recognised the importance it would hold for the future. He called his chronicle Historia de Morbo and described the Black Death as we know it today: even when describing the siege of Caffa, he used terminology such as “the whole army was affected by a disease which overran the Tartars and killed thousands upon thousands every day.” De Mussis died in 1356, shortly after the worst years of the Black Death had passed.

Pope Clement VI

Pope Clement VI

Pope Clement VI (r. 1342-52) ruled throughout the entire period we know as the Black Death and survived it. Initially, he stayed at his Papal seat in Avignon, before eventually retreating to one of his country retreats, away from the city, where he stayed between two roaring fires, day and night, presuming that warm air would keep plague away. Clement survived the plague, but his reputation has largely differed between historians. Some commend him for staying in Avignon for as long as possible, while others berate him for running away from his post as Pope. The latter argument is also a suggestion why many people lost faith in traditional religious structures at the time: if the Pope had run away into hiding, why should the common people take him seriously?

Responses to the Black Death

Social Responses: Jews

As ever in medieval Europe, there was an overarching need to blame someone or something for the transmission of plague. Rats were one theory (it was not until later that it was discovered that it was actually fleas on the black rats which transmitted plague), but to many Europeans, Jews were a more obvious scapegoat. 

A medieval depiction of the burning of
Jews during the Black Death

Anti-Semitism was not uncommon in Europe in the fourteenth century, and the Jews seemed like one of the most obvious groups to blame. The initial rumour was that Jews poisoned wells with plague, as a means to pass it onto Christians. People found this to be a valid theory as many Jews would not collect their water from public wells, but source it from rivers and brooks instead. The reason behind it was not because they were poisoning wells, but because they were aware of higher hygiene standards – in other words, the Jews knew that they were less likely to contract disease from a river than a public well which whole communities were using.

Unfortunately, this resulted in mass pogroms across central and western Europe. In September 1348, a trial of a group of Jews admitted under torture that they had poisoned the wells, and in Basel, Stuttgart, Ulm, Speyer and Dresden, groups of Jews were rounded up and burned alive. Two of the worst examples were in Strasbourg, where 2000 Jews were massacred and in Mainz, where 12,000 were killed. Many Jews from central Europe fled to Poland, which remained a principal Jewish sanctuary until the Second World War.

Social Responses: Popular Risings

During the Black Death, landholders needed peasants to work more to compensate for those who had died of the plague. In return, many peasants demanded higher wages, and would refuse to work if they were not paid a higher amount. In England, King Edward III’s response was to introduce the Statute of Labourers in 1351. This legislation aimed to reduce peasants’ wages to pre-plague levels, so that they could not claim for what landholders deemed as “excessive” wages.

In France, a similar uprising called the Jacquerie occurred in 1358, largely due to similar reasons. By 1381 in England, the Peasants’ Revolt had broken out: some connections can indeed be linked back to the Statute of Labourers, and thus the Black Death as a reason for the uprising.

Religious Responses

A fifteenth century woodcut of two
flagellants

As we had already discussed, the Pope had fled, leaving many people frustrated at the Catholic Church. One of the most recognisable religious responses was the rise in extremists. A notable group were the Flagellants.

Based primarily in the Low Countries, the flagellants walked from town to town, whipping themselves as punishment for their sins: they believed that God had sent the plague to Earth as a way to punish mankind, and they believed that by publicly whipping themselves, they could gain penance for their sins. Naturally, the flagellants were a spectacle that nobody had seen before, so people crowded around to watch them. As a result of walking from town to town and attracting large crowds, the flagellants simply helped to spread plague further into Europe.

Medical Responses

Not often noted for their medical knowledge, medieval doctors had very little idea of how to deal with the Black Death. Most medieval medicine was based on Ancient Greek knowledge, of the four humours of the body, and bloodletting as a means of helping to balance the humours. Other useless prescriptions were often prescribed, including holding an onion under an armpit where there was a buboe, or holding a chicken’s anus against a buboe. The Black Death forced medical science to evolve past the Ancient Greek knowledge, and over the course of the next three centuries, significant advancements were made.

Isolation?

The city of Dubrovnik: a key centre for
quarantine during the Black Death

Quarantine was one of the most significant methods of dealing with the Black Death. The most notable example was the city of Dubrovnik in Croatia which self-quarantined itself, saving thousands of countless other lives. The quarantine period was between 7-40 days, so not too dissimilar to what is being recommended today.

Conclusions

The Dance of Death: an image often
used to describe the Black Death

Hopefully this has given a very brief overview of the Black Death – please do feel free to leave a comment to let me know what you think! As ever, if you’d like to learn about anything at all history related, you can email me at historyin20@gmail.com or find me on Facebook at ‘History in 20’. Thanks for reading!

History Book Recommendations

History Book Recommendations

Disclaimer: I don't own these books here (unfortunately)

Hi everyone, and welcome back to the History in 20 Blog! I know at the moment times can be challenging for everyone, and keeping yourself occupied can be a real struggle. So, I’ve decided to put together a list of some history books that I’d definitely recommend reading, which might help to keep you entertained if you’re into that – or if you’d just like something different to read for a change.

I’ll list each book, and websites that are still delivering copies, so you can still get them from online sellers, such as World of Books, Abe Books and Amazon. I’ll list them chronologically too, so without further ado, let’s get into it!

Ancient History

Tom Holland, Persian Fire: The First World Empire and the Battle for the West (2006)

One of the best writers of ancient history, Tom Holland certainly lives up to his reputation in this book. The main narrative covers King Xerxes (King of Persia) and the build-up to, and ultimate invasion of, Ancient Greece in 480 BCE. The story tells of the largest army ever mustered at the time against a small Greek force. I’ll say no more, but it’s worth reading if you like a good underdog story set in the Ancient Mediterranean!

Persian Fire is available from the following online retailers:

Amazon: £6.99 (brand new), £4.58 (second-hand).

Mary Beard, SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome (2016)

This 2016 publication is ‘the work of about fifty years’ according to the author. Mary Beard is an established social historian, specialising in Ancient Rome. SPQR is a fantastic read if you want a good overview of Ancient Rome, but it’s an especially interesting read if you’re into social history: that is, if you’d like to learn about the ins and outs of daily life in Ancient Rome.

Aside from simply a social history of Rome, Beard covers the period from 753 BCE (the accepted foundation date of Rome) to 212 CE (when citizenship was extended to all peoples of the Roman Empire), and briefly touches on the ‘Third Century Crisis’.

SPQR is available from the following online retailers:
Amazon: £9.37 (brand new)

eBay: £7.99 (second-hand)

British History

As I’m primarily interested in medieval history, the majority of these books are from that period.

David Starkey, Crown & Country: The Kings and Queens of England: A History (2010)

One of history’s most controversial characters, but a good author nevertheless: David Starkey takes the reader through over one thousand years of British history, from the Anglo-Saxon kings, who were practically a myth, up to Queen Elizabeth II’s current reign (until 2010, when this book was published).

This book helped me an incredible amount when I was writing the blogs about the Plantagenets, as it gives a brief, yet detailed, overview of all of the monarchs, as well as covering major events in their reigns. Definitely worth a read if you’re into royal history.

Crown & Country is available from the following online retailers:

Amazon: £9.66 (brand new), £4.95 (second hand)

eBay: £.3.60 (second-hand)

Dan Jones, The Plantagenets: The Kings Who made England (2012)

Quite possibly my favourite history book I’ve ever read. Dan Jones’ writing style makes it an easy book to read, and his form of narrative history keeps the whole saga of the Plantagenets understandable, engaging and enjoyable. Although sometimes a bit over-the-top in certain parts, the book is definitely worth reading if you’re interested in medieval Britain (particularly from the twelfth to the fifteenth centuries).

As well as covering the lives and reigns of the Plantagenet kings, the book does not ignore the lives of the peasants, so it gives a good overview of both sides of the story.

The Plantagenets is available from the following online retailers:
Amazon: £7.99 (brand new)

AbeBooks: £9.95 (brand new)

European History

Simon Jenkins, A Short History of Europe: From Pericles to Putin (2018)

Jenkins wrote this after his best-selling A Short History of England: and it was best-selling for a reason – it’s a fantastic read! Similarly, his Short History of Europe is equally as good a read. It covers the period from 2500 BCE in Ancient Greece right up 2018, when it was published.

What I particularly like about this book is that Jenkins states a few major events in each chapter, so if you’d just like to learn about a particular event, or read a particular section, then that option is available: for instance, Chapter 13 is entitled: “From Reason to Rebellion: 1715-1789” – but underneath, the major events are listed and are as follows: “War of Austrian Succession – Maria Theresa – Frederick the Great – Catherine the Great – Seven Years War – William Pitt – American War of Independence”.

It’s a good overview of European history as well, rather than just focussing on one country. I definitely recommend this one!

A Short History of Europe is available from the following online retailers:

Amazon: £8.01 (second hand)

eBay: £3.99 (second hand)

Desmond Seward, A Brief History of the Hundred Years War: The English in France, 1337-1453 (2003)

The entire ‘Brief History of’ series are very well written books that do exactly what they say on the tin (or front cover). Well-known characters are all included in this book, including Edward III, the Black Prince, Henry V, John II of France, and Charles VII of France, and major events including the legendary Battle of Agincourt (1415) are discussed in surprisingly great detail. A fantastic introduction and overview of one of Europe’s longest, bloodiest conflicts.

Available from the following online retailers:

Amazon: £5.72 (brand new)

eBay: £5.57 (second hand)

John Julius Norwich, Four Princes: Henry VIII, Francis I, Charles V, Suleiman the Magnificent and the Obsessions that Forged Modern Europe (2017)

Going (a tiny bit more) modern with this one! This is quite a unique read, in the sense that the book doesn’t focus just on the individual reigns of the aforementioned monarchs one at a time, but looks at their reigns as a whole, and how decisions between themselves changed the course of European history. Although, whether that was changed for the better or for worse is for the reader to decide!

Four Princes is available from the following online retailers:

Amazon: £4.26 (second hand)

AbeBooks: £4.27 (second hand)

eBay: £4.79 (second hand)

US History

Kevin Starr, California: A History (2005)

Arguably California’s best-ever historian, the late Kevin Starr wrote plenty of books on the Golden State, but this is easily one of the most readable and interesting. Although it’s not a full overview of American history, it is a very detailed overview to Californian history. The book covers the period from 1510 (the first documented description of California) to 2005 (the publication of this book). Everything from the Gold Rush, Hollywood, the two World Wars, rock ‘n’ roll, civil rights and environmental activism is covered – in depth – in less than 350 pages. A must-read for anyone interested in California!

California: A History is available from the following online retailers:

Amazon: £10.99 (brand new)

AbeBooks: £9.54 (second hand)

World History

Felipe Fernández-Armesto, 1492: The Year Our World Began (2011)

This is a fantastic book by a renowned academic, but the tone of the book is very much readable, and not an academic slog to get through. The book focusses on the year 1492 (shock horror!), globally. 1492 was a major year for two primary reasons: Christopher Columbus “discovered” the Americas, and the Jews were expelled from Spain.

But this book covers much more than that – and on a much larger scale. It covers various themes: social, economic, and religious history to name a few parts. It also talks about history globally – from the Caribbean to Japan, and from Indonesia to Russia. A superb read if the late medieval world is up your street!

1492 is available from the following online retailers:

Amazon: £3.86 (second hand)

World of Books: £4.99 (second hand)

Peter Frankopan, The Silk Roads: A New History of the World (2015)

Best-selling author Peter Frankopan lived up to his reputation with this 2015 publication. Covering both Asian and American history in this book, Frankopan explains how the world once looked to the “New World” and the Americas for trade, but now how the East is dominating our trade routes and networks today.

A very interesting read which challenges a lot of traditional historical scholarship, so if that’s your kind of thing, I’d certainly recommend it.

Silk Roads is available from the following online retailers:

Amazon: £7.36 (brand new)

eBay: £7.36 (brand new)

If anyone has any other recommendations, please don’t hesitate to let me know. Stay safe everyone!